Music Analysis for Expert Testimony in Copyright Infringement Litigation

by

M. Fletcher Reynolds
B. Mus., Louisiana State University, 1973
M. Mus., Louisiana State University, 1974
M. Phil., University of Kansas, 1977
J.D., Tulane Law School, 1990

Submitted to the Department of Music and Dance
and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the
University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
(Music Theory)

Dissertation Committee:

Stanley N. Shumway, Chairman
Stephen C. Anderson
J. Bunker Clark
Anne Kimberley Dayton
Charles K. Hoag

Dissertation defended: March 1991

© 1991 M. Fletcher Reynolds

 

Patents and copyrights approach, nearer than any other
class of cases belonging to forensic discussions, to what
may be called the metaphysics of the law, where the
distinctions are, or at least may be, very subtle and
refined, and, sometimes, almost evanescent.

Justice Joseph Story*

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

List of Illustrations

Acknowledgements

Preface

CHAPTER 1: Historical and Philosophical Bases of Copyright Law

CHAPTER 2: Introduction to Copyright Ligitation

CHAPTER 3: Overview of Music Analysis

CHAPTER 4: Presentation of Evidence: Exemplary Cases

CHAPTER 5: Methods of Reduction: The Search for Musical Significance

CHAPTER 6: Methods of Comparison: The Search for Similarities

CHAPTER 7: Copying: The Substantiality of Similarities

CHAPTER 8: Misappropriation: Substantiality of the Taking

CHAPTER 9: Proposals for More Effective Use of Music Experts

Appendices

Bibliography

__________________

* Folsom v. Marsh, 9 F. Cas. 342, 344 (C.C.D. Mass. 1841) (No. 4,901).

 

 

CH1-LEGNEW.DRF CH1-LEGNEW.DRF